Psychological Profiles of Basketball Players Across Different Playing Positions: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • Prof. Chandra Bhan Singh Department Physical Education, P.G. College, Malikpura, Gazipur, India
  • Vivek Kumar Singh Department Physical Education, P.G. College, Malikpura, Gazipur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsssr.v4i3.651

Keywords:

Basketball, Psychological Profile, Playing Position, Mental Toughness, Sports Psychology

Abstract

Basketball is a high-intensity sport in which physical fitness, technical proficiency, cognitive abilities, and psychological characteristics interact to influence athletic performance. The psychological demands of the game may vary considerably according to the specific responsibilities associated with different playing positions. Point guards are required to demonstrate decision-making, confidence, and composure, whereas shooting guards may require motivation, aggression, and the ability to recover quickly from performance errors. Small forwards must exhibit adaptability and mental toughness, while power forwards and centers require resilience, concentration, emotional control, and composure under physical and competitive pressure. The present study focuses on the comparative psychological profiles of basketball players across the five conventional playing positions: point guard, shooting guard, small forward, power forward, and center. The study examines psychological characteristics including concentration, mental toughness, aggression, stress tolerance, and broader personality attributes. A comparative approach is proposed to identify positional variations in psychological characteristics and to examine the extent to which role-specific demands are reflected in players' psychological profiles. The study is significant for coaches, sports psychologists, talent-identification professionals, and athletes because it may contribute to position-specific psychological training, player development, and performance enhancement. The investigation also addresses a research gap arising from the relatively limited and inconsistent evidence concerning psychological differences among basketball players across specific playing positions.

References

Alkasasbeh, W. J., & Akroush, S. H. (2025). Sports motivation: a narrative review of psychological approaches to enhance athletic performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1645274.

Ashdown, B., Mulvenna, C., Nicholls, S., Partington, M., McKay, A., Oxenham, P., Cook, J., Kirkham, L., Cobb, N., & Saward, C. (2026). The evolving role of performance analysis in football: Integrating the observation of psychological behaviours. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 21(3), 1739–1750.

Nuñez, P. D. P., & Lyras, A. (2018). Basketball, innovation and change agency: Historical overview and current landscape. Sport and Olympic-Paralympic Studies Journal, 3(1), 155–163.

Petersen, L. (2024). Sports psychology: Mental resilience and performance in elite athletes. Revista de Psicología Del Deporte (Journal of Sport Psychology), 33(2), 271–279.

Predoiu, A., Săftel, A. M., Quartiroli, A., & Moanţă, A. D. (2026). Heymans’ cube model of temperament in the case of basketball coaches. Timisoara Physical Education and Rehabilitation Journal, 19(36), 1–13.

Shuai, Y., Wang, S., Liu, X., Kueh, Y. C., & Kuan, G. (2023). The influence of the five-factor model of personality on performance in competitive sports: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1284378.

Volgemute, K., Ulme, G., Abele, A., Vazne, Z., Ansons, K., Licis, R., Lavins, R., & Klonova, A. (2026). Multi-factorial profiling of athletes integrating personality, psychological skills, and Psychophysiological performance indicators. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 4949.

Warren, R. J., Skelly, D. K., Schmitz, O. J., & Bradford, M. A. (2011). Universal ecological patterns in college basketball communities. PLoS One, 6(3), e17342.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-02

How to Cite

Singh, C. B., & Singh, V. K. (2026). Psychological Profiles of Basketball Players Across Different Playing Positions: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Science and Social Science Research, 4(3), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsssr.v4i3.651

Similar Articles

21-30 of 98

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.