Documentary Erasure: Sexual Violence, the Politics of Counting, and the Gendering of Ethnic Conflict in Manipur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsssr.v4i2.642Keywords:
conflict-related sexual violence, Manipur, ethnic conflict, documentary erasure, intersectionality, Northeast IndiaAbstract
Feminist scholarship on ethnic conflict has established that women’s bodies carry the symbolic weight of communal boundaries, and that wartime sexual violence operates as a strategy of collective humiliation rather than as private criminality. This article argues that symbolic analysis alone cannot explain how gendered harm survives its own public exposure. Drawing on the conflict between the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities in Manipur since May 2023, it identifies a second mechanism: the documentary regime through which the state records, classifies, and compensates for violence. Of the 6,523 First Information Reports registered by August 2023, eleven concerned crimes against women and children. Ex gratia lists count the dead but hold no category for rape. A 142-day communications blackout removed the channels through which survivors reach police, lawyers and journalists. India appears in no United Nations register of conflict-related sexual violence. The article also reads the May 2023 stripping of two Kuki-Zo women against the Kangla Fort protest of 2004, arguing that perpetrators expropriated a repertoire Manipuri women had themselves built for resistance. It closes with proposals for disaggregated conflict data, gender-specific compensation categories and shutdown exemptions for reporting infrastructure.
References
Akpinar, A. (2003). The honour/shame complex revisited: Violence against women in the migration context. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(5), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2003.08.001
Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India, (2020) 3 SCC 637 (India).
Banerjee, S., Chatterji, A. P., Chaudhry, L. N., Desai, M., Toor, S., & Visweswaran, K. (2004). Engendering violence: Boundaries, histories, and the everyday. Cultural Dynamics, 16(2-3), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0921374004047739
Basnet, M. (2019). Disrobed and dissenting bodies of the Meira Paibi: Postcolonial counterpublic activism. Communication and the Public, 4(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319871022
Bora, P. (2010). Between the human, the citizen and the tribal: Reading feminist politics in India’s Northeast. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12(3-4), 341-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2010.513100
Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women and rape. Simon & Schuster.
Buss, D. E. (2009). Rethinking ‘rape as a weapon of war’. Feminist Legal Studies, 17(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9118-5
Butalia, U. (1998). The other side of silence: Voices from the partition of India. Penguin Books.
Card, C. (2008). The paradox of genocidal rape aimed at enforced pregnancy. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 46(S1), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00162.x
Carpenter, R. C. (2000). Surfacing children: Limitations of genocidal rape discourse. Human Rights Quarterly, 22(2), 428-477. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2000.0020
Cockburn, C. (2013). War and security, women and gender: An overview of the issues. Gender & Development, 21(3), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2013.846632
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. University of California Press.
Fernandes, L. (Ed.). (2021). Routledge Handbook of Gender in South Asia (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003043102
Handrahan, L. (2004). Conflict, gender, ethnicity and post-conflict reconstruction. Security Dialogue, 35(4), 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010604049521
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. (2024). Global report on internal displacement 2024. IDMC.
International Crisis Group. (2025). Finding a way out of festering conflict in India’s Manipur (Asia Report No. 346). International Crisis Group.
MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Harvard University Press.
McDuie-Ra, D. (2012). Violence against women in the militarized Indian frontier: Beyond ‘Indian culture’ in the experiences of ethnic minority women. Violence Against Women, 18(3), 322-345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212443114
Menon, R., & Bhasin, K. (1998). Borders and boundaries: Women in India’s partition. Rutgers University Press.
Misri, D. (2011). ‘Are you a man?’: Performing naked protest in India. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36(3), 603-625. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/657487
Salzman, T. A. (1998). Rape camps as a means of ethnic cleansing: Religious, cultural, and ethical responses to rape victims in the former Yugoslavia. Human Rights Quarterly, 20(2), 348-378. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1998.0019
Snyder, C. S., Gabbard, W. J., May, J. D., & Zulcic, N. (2006). On the battleground of women’s bodies: Mass rape in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 21(2), 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109905286017
United Nations Security Council. (2026). Conflict-related sexual violence: Report of the Secretary-General (S/2026/321). United Nations.
Weitsman, P. A. (2008). The politics of identity and sexual violence: A review of Bosnia and Rwanda. Human Rights Quarterly, 30(3), 561-578. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0024
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender & nation. SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222201
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Science and Social Science Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
