Autonomous District Councils Under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India: Challenges and Prospects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63671/ijsssr.v4i1.577Keywords:
Sixth Schedule, Autonomous District Councils, tribal self-governance, Northeast India, indigenous rights, federalism, customary law, financial devolutionAbstract
The Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India provides a unique framework of autonomous governance for tribal communities in the northeastern states of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. Established under Articles 244(2) and 275(1), Autonomous District Councils (ADCs) were envisioned as instruments of self-governance that would protect the cultural identity, customary laws, and social practices of indigenous tribal peoples. However, more than several decades after their inception, ADCs continue to grapple with formidable challenges that impede their effective functioning. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the structural, financial, administrative, and socio-political challenges confronting ADCs, while simultaneously examining their considerable prospects in the context of India's evolving federal framework and the growing global discourse on indigenous rights. Drawing on constitutional provisions, legislative records, judicial interpretations, and scholarly literature, the paper argues that with meaningful reforms in financial devolution, administrative capacity, and intergovernmental relations, ADCs can serve as robust institutions for tribal self-determination and sustainable development in India's northeastern frontier.
References
Baruah, S. (2005). Durable disorder: Understanding the politics of northeast India. Oxford University Press.
Chaube, S. K. (1999). Hill politics in northeast India (2nd ed.). Orient Longman.
Constitution of India. (1950). The Constitution of India: Sixth Schedule (Articles 244(2) and 275(1)). Government of India.
Fifteenth Finance Commission. (2021). Finance Commission in COVID times: Report for 2021–26 (Vol. 1). Government of India. https://fincomindia.nic.in
Goswami, A. (2014). Autonomous district councils in Northeast India: Political dynamics and governance challenges. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 60(3), 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019556120140306
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Clarendon Press.
Lapidoth, R. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible solutions to ethnic conflicts. United States Institute of Peace Press.
Longkumer, A. (2019). 'As our ancestors once lived': Representation, performance and constructing a Naga identity in India. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 26(5), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2018.1452068
Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India. (2022). Annual report 2021–22. Government of India. https://tribal.nic.in
Misra, U. (2011). The periphery strikes back: Challenges to the nation-state in Assam and Nagaland. Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
Nongkynrih, A. K. (2002). Khasi society of Meghalaya: A sociological understanding. Indus Publishing.
Shimray, U. A. (2007). Let freedom ring! Story of naga nationalism. Promilla & Co. Publishers.
Shullai, B. M. (2006). Governance under the Sixth Schedule: District councils in Meghalaya. Regency Publications.
United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly (A/RES/61/295). United Nations. https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.html
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Science and Social Science Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
